c checking for null

That said, Ive used both professionally and null have no preference for either.
Empty; public static string NullIfEmpty(this string text) return String.
Using checking in place of will be caught by any competent compiler null with the checking correct warning checking settings.
Personally Ive always used if checking (ptr null) because it makes my intent explicit, but at this point its just a habit.If theres not one, details like this should be left as they are written.If (foo) is clear enough.This can be quite useful in some scenarios.No matter which way you go, youll eventually get used to it, and the loss of friction checking when working null in other peoples code will be welcome.I use if (ptr but this is completely not worth arguing about.Using custom null check helper methods.Either standardize or dont.

The reason for this is bully that the null macro is deceptive (as nearly all macros are) it is actually 0 literal, not a unique type as the name suggests it might.
However, unlike what happens when calling an instance null method on a null reference, when an extension method is called with a null reference, it does not throw.
Since the very first versions, ReSharper game users had a whole bunch of context actions and quick-fixes at their disposal, such.
Extension methods are static methods which crack behave like instance methods.There are situations, where you first check for the validity of a pointer, and if it is null, you just return/exit out of a function.Thats because we want ReSharper to correctly resolve the method and insert required using directives when needed.As everyone said, references can't be null.Recently, into while working on OKI 431 microcontroller, Ive noticed that the following: unsigned char chx; if (chx) /.In those cases, I do handle the error first: if (error_condition) bail_or_fix return if not fixed; / If I'm still here, I'm on the happy path crack By dealing with the unusual condition up front, I can take care of it and then forget about.Live Demo.NET Fiddle, previous, next.ReSharper null 2017.2 advances null checking even further.